From
alleged government espionage programs to religious scandals of assault or abuse
– where among this barrage of Lord of the
Flies scenes do Buddhist observers find confirmation of the belief that
people are inherently good?
When
the historical Buddha Shakyamuni founded his order of ascetic monks, he
established no rules. I presume he did not lay down any because he and
Buddhists in general consider every being wise and compassionate by nature.
However, even this enlightened soul developed precepts for transgressions that
people committed.
As
Buddhism migrates westward to countries with explicitly stated natural rights,
a general regard for human rights and more comprehensive sets of constitutional
laws, and legal systems based ideally on the pursuit of liberty, justice and
happiness, how should the religious demand civil treatment, if at all? How
should the religious assure that civil rights begin from within their
institutions?
Whereas fundamentalist
Buddhists may argue for an essentialist transference of Buddhism to the west --
everything should proceed as it had in Asia. Karma will take care of
everything, regardless of human nature. Those deserving of support or
condemnation will receive them accordingly. Monastics are to swim upstream
(metaphorically speaking) and pursue not liberty, justice or happiness
but only ultimate freedom from cyclic existence. And for such goals, monastics
of a Buddhist order must be obedient and docile, there are no inalienable
rights to speak of.
Buddhism
acculturates into the culture that it enters. Inevitably, western culture will
change Buddhism as Buddhism will change this culture. Cultural and ideological
differences should be cause for Buddhist orders to reconsider and incorporate
at least the principles of fairness, procedural due process, and equality. Hence,
I as a Buddhist nun, would advocate that monastics in the U.S. and beyond be
accorded certain basic rights, and best if these were put in writing.
Image from https://www.pinterest.com/pin/388787380303276966/
Presuming
a different cultural context and few enlightened teachers in the U.S., it is
especially important to institute fair and standardized due process. For
example, to avoid or prevent different standards and lack of clarity so that
neither ecumenical nor secular authorities may manipulate or miscommunicate the
interpretations of law.
In
an increasingly litigious society, religious organizations ought to consider
more preventative measures and remedial resources. Offering confidential
counsel to listen and to advise those faced with frustration, developing
ombudsman and mediator roles to ameliorate charges and improve relations are a
few possibilities. Otherwise, in cases of alleged abuse, victims usually remain
silent for a long time and finally report in less than amicable circumstances.
The same applies to cases of alleged transgressions. Counseling, advising, and
mediation are better ways to improve any individual or system issues.
Principles
east and west can be misused anywhere. Therefore it is important, for one, to
recognize that karma is not the same as punishment. No one in a position of
authority may oppress in the name of karma. The law of cause and effect is also
agency for creating our future and that is exactly what we are to do. Two,
democracy is not to be imitated and warped into a game of win or loss, and
certainly not a propaganda ploy for anyone and everyone to scrutinize some
target as if she were an election candidate while the voting grounds shift
continuously. Three, silence and homogeneity are not harmony. Minority voices
ought not be squashed in the name of harmony. And four, absolute docility and
obedience can bring out the worst in people. The 1971 Stanford prison project
showed that whereby absolute power was granted the wardens (assumed by college
students), decent college students turned sadistic and destructive in a short
span of a few days. Prison inmates (also assumed by college students,
unbeknownst to the wardens) were harmed to such an extent that the originally
planned two-week experiment had to terminate abruptly on its sixth day.
In
short, as religious orders adapt and assimilate in the West, they cannot help
but evolve. I hope, however, the direction in which they move will encourage
the pursuit of both democratic and spiritual ideals.